Matthew H. Haverstick

Matthew H. Haverstick



Matt Haverstick is the Managing Partner of Kleinbard and a member of the Firm’s Litigation Department. He is one of Pennsylvania’s preeminent appellate and trial lawyers, representing government officials, public entities, political parties, private companies, and individuals in high-stakes litigation and appeals in state and federal courts.

Matt is a leading advocate in Pennsylvania political and election law, with deep experience in matters involving public officials, urgent questions of public policy, and grand jury practice. He has appeared before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and Commonwealth Court hundreds of times, routinely litigating cases that shape statewide governance and election administration. His election work spans the full range of disputes—from nomination petition challenges and ballot litigation to issues involving election procedures, certification, and post-election contests.

Matt also has a significant national appellate record. He helped secure a major victory on behalf of the Pennsylvania Department of Treasury in an original-jurisdiction matter before the Supreme Court of the United States, recovering more than $10 million in unclaimed property funds for the Commonwealth.

In recent years, Matt’s been recognized as a go-to litigator for elected officials and legislative clients in consequential legal disputes. Chief among his representations has been the Pennsylvania Senate Republican Caucus in litigation arising from attempted impeachment proceedings involving Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, a matter that drew statewide attention and was ultimately resolved by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on procedural grounds. He also represented America PAC in separate high-profile litigation involving District Attorney Krasner, as well as the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority defending it against a constitutional challenge by Krasner against a law appointing a special prosecutor for crimes on SEPTA.

Outside the election and political arena, Matt has handled high-profile litigation involving Pennsylvania “skill games,” serving as lead counsel for Pace-O-Matic in Pennsylvania, including litigation that has been the subject of extensive public coverage and appellate review. In 2023, the Commonwealth Court held that Pace-O-Matic’s games do not constitute illegal gambling under Pennsylvania law, a decision that significantly affected the industry statewide. Matt has an active civil practice adverse to such public agencies as the State Ethics Commission, the Gaming Control Board, the Attorney General’s Office and the Liquor Control Board, and he also represents high-level staff from many of those agencies in various litigation matters.

Rounding out his key matters have been constitutional litigation involving charter schools, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg.

Referred to in media coverage as a “counsel of choice” for state Republican clients in major policy fights, Matt is trusted for his command of Pennsylvania government and appellate courts—and for delivering results in matters where the legal issues, the public attention, and the stakes are all high. Matt has also earned the honor of being named in Ranked in Chambers USA Guide, in the area of Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations in Pennsylvania since 2015.

Read More